The is the first post in a short series offering a technical summary of the 23 projects in the UKOER 2 programme. It is based on interviews with the projects, the data and information summarised here is all available in PROD.
The JISC site describes the programme as follows:
“Phase 2 of the HEFCE-funded Open Educational Resources (OER) programme is managed jointly by the Higher Education Academy(Academy) and JISC. Running between August 2010 and August 2011, it will build on and expand the work of the pilot phase around the release of OER material, and commence research and technical work examining the discovery and use of OER – specifically by academics.“.
The technical requirements provided to projects are outlined in OER 2 Technical Requirements.
Subsequent posts in this series look at:
- Content description
- Licences and encoding
- Content management platforms
- OER creation tools used
- Analytics and tools to manipulate OER
- Dissemination protocols in use and Jorum representation
- A closer look at Strand C of the programme [forthcoming]
- Synthesis and [hopefully] comparing UKOER and UKOER 2 [forthcoming]
[These posts should be regarded as drafts for comment until I remove this note]
as before this data is a snapshot of a project’s choices at a point in time during the programme – it sometimes talks about active intent or choices being explored and so it may not reflect final options. As in the UKOER prod summary it should be noted that selection of a choice (i.e. using X) is not exclusive. For example, projects may often use platforms from online providers (such as YouTube) alongside organisationally provided options (such as a repository).
This strand of the programme focused on creating both a static and dynamic collection of OER and generally explored issues around aggregation in more detail – as such these six projects and their tech choices are worth reviewing in greater detail. The data from their interviews has, however, also been included in the general summary when appropriate.
for a variety of reasons one project is not in this data so the displayed information is out of 22 projects (and as noted the categories may not always be relevant to all of the Strand C projects)